I have been swamped with teaching, so I have not been really paying attention to the news lately. So when I learned that I now have the option to actually remove my sect from my personal status register (Nufus) I had to rub my eyes and pinch myself. How did that happen?
Apart from increasing my respect for minister of interior, Ziad Baroud, even more, this is probably the only piece of news coming from Lebanon over the past few years that I find worth celebrating. As the atheist product of a mixed marriage, I take this personally. As a student of late Ottoman and modern history, I find it phenomenal.
Over the past 150+ years, the tendency in proto-Lebanon and Lebanon has been towards increasing institutionalization of sectarianism and the increasing intertwinement of the idea of citizenship with sect. This can be traced back to the contradictory 1856 Islahat Fermani, which, in the same breath, affirmed the sameness of the citizens of the Ottoman Empire while addressing them as nations/sects (millet). The various stops on the way — the 1860 Mount Lebanon war, the French Mandate reforms, the national pact, Taef, Hizballah’s political turn, etc — all in a long term perspective served to further entrench and institutionalize this intertwinement between citizen and sect.
Now this comes, a counter intuitive surprise considering the overall trend. It is, of course, nothing like a magical wave of the wand which undoes sect. Clearly, the parliament, voting system, and our “representative” “democracy” can continue along the same lines even if the very last citizen were to remove his sect from the register. Particularly when they are all based on a census whose population no longer exists.
But that is precisely why the option to remove one’s sect from the register is so phenomenal: the burden of responsiblity rests with me, as a person and citizen, to go tomorrow early morning and remove my sect from the Nufus register. And therein lies the challenge. What will become of it will only be a viable discussion once the widespread rejection of sectarian citizenship becomes fact. So, I find myself wondering, how many will do it? And how many will ask themselves: who am I if not my sect?
February 12, 2009 at 4:30 am
[...] But that is precisely why the option to remove one’s sect from the register is so phenomenal: the burden of responsibility rests with me, as a person and citizen, to go tomorrow early morning and remove my sect from the Nufus register. And therein lies the challenge. What will become of it will only be a viable discussion once the widespread rejection of sectarian citizenship becomes fact. So, I find myself wondering, how many will do it? And how many will ask themselves: who am I if not my sect? >> [...]
February 12, 2009 at 9:47 am
Definitely a step in the right direction.
But how do I get to vote, since polling locations are segregated by sect and by gender?
I feel diminished already. How will my beloved sectarian leader protect me? Will the state be ready to step into the void?
MM.
February 13, 2009 at 11:03 am
[...] agree with what Ms. Tee wrote in her post from a few days ago: this is about the secularist’s rights and beliefs. Not [...]
February 13, 2009 at 11:53 am
Great post.
February 13, 2009 at 2:27 pm
A good example for Egypt to follow
February 14, 2009 at 11:00 pm
[...] Tee from B-side Beirut was among the supporters of Baroud's decision: I have been swamped with teaching, so I have not [...]
February 15, 2009 at 5:26 am
Nice work as always. Do you feel like running for president? :)
I quoted you on Global Voices.
http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/02/15/lebanon-a-civil-marriage-valentine/
February 16, 2009 at 9:14 am
[...] 16, 2009 by Bech Some people voiced satisfaction over the idea that the sect was removed from the personal status register (it was already removed [...]
February 16, 2009 at 9:18 am
Hello Ms tee, instead of commenting, I wrote something as an answer to your post and the event on my blog. Let me know what you think.
February 16, 2009 at 9:56 pm
[...] Tee, dal blog B-side Beirut [in], è fra i sostenitori della disposizione di Baroud: Ultimamente, essendo molto presa [...]
February 20, 2009 at 1:30 pm
[...] Tee, blog B-side Beirut [in], je među onima što podržavaju predlog [...]
February 21, 2009 at 10:07 pm
[...] Tee avy amin’ny B-side Beirut dia isan'ireo nankasitraka ny fanapahan-kevitr'ingahy Baroud: Tototry ny asa fampianarana [...]
March 20, 2009 at 7:15 am
Hola T,
Missing your commentary these days…
Yalla, get back in the saddle!
April 15, 2009 at 11:34 pm
I’m just wondering what this means really. On the surface it sounds good, but what happens when it comes to voting? What happens when it comes to matters such as marriage? Inheritance? Aren’t they still handled/managed by the relevant religious institution? If so, then why are we happy about plastic surgery? Until a lot of other things change, I am very suspicious of this single lonely move.
May 2, 2009 at 6:50 pm
What do we have to do to bring you back … :(
Hope all is well … d